Define eminent的問題，透過圖書和論文來找解法和答案更準確安心。 我們找到下列地圖、推薦、景點和餐廳等資訊懶人包

What It Took to Win: A History of the Democratic Party

為了解決Define eminent的問題，作者Kazin, Michael 這樣論述：

A New York Times Book Review Editors’ ChoiceA leading historian tells the story of the United States’ most enduring political party and its long, imperfect and newly invigorated quest for ＂moral capitalism,＂ from Andrew Jackson to Joseph Biden. One of Kirkus Reviews’ 40 most anticipated books of

2022One of Vulture’s 49 books we can’t wait to read in 2022The Democratic Party is the world’s oldest mass political organization. Since its inception in the early nineteenth century, it has played a central role in defining American society, whether it was exercising power or contesting it. But wha

t has the party stood for through the centuries, and how has it managed to succeed in elections and govern? In What It Took to Win, the eminent historian Michael Kazin identifies and assesses the party’s long-running commitment to creating ＂moral capitalism＂--a system that mixed entrepreneurial free

dom with the welfare of workers and consumers. And yet the same party that championed the rights of the white working man also vigorously protected or advanced the causes of slavery, segregation, and Indian removal. As the party evolved towards a more inclusive egalitarian vision, it won durable vic

tories for Americans of all backgrounds. But it also struggled to hold together a majority coalition and advance a persuasive agenda for the use of government. Kazin traces the party’s fortunes through vivid character sketches of its key thinkers and doers, from Martin Van Buren and William Jennings

Bryan to the financier August Belmont and reformers such as Eleanor Roosevelt, Sidney Hillman, and Jesse Jackson. He also explores the records of presidents from Andrew Jackson and Woodrow Wilson to Bill Clinton and Barack Obama. Throughout, Kazin reveals the rich interplay of personality, belief,

strategy, and policy that define the life of the party--and outlines the core components of a political endeavor that may allow President Biden and his co-partisans to renew the American experiment.

Scrapbook for Chinese Collectors

為了解決Define eminent的問題，作者Gulik, Robert Hans Van (TRN) 這樣論述：

The Shu Hua Shuo Ling--a treatise on painting and forgery--was written in the eighteenth century by the relatively obscure Chinese scholar, Lu Shih-hua. It might have vanished from the landscape of Asian art history, had the eminent Sinologue, R. H. van Gulik, not recognized its essential value to o

ur modern understanding of Chinese connoisseurship. Its worth lies in the intellectual honesty of the author in his description of the artist, his motivations and the criteria by which his work was evaluated in traditional China. Of particular interest is Lu's observations on the issue of authentici

ty. One wonders what chance we have to determine the authenticity of a work today, when even those with profound knowledge of the artists, their styles and work in the eighteenth century were challenged to do likewise. One also leaves Lu's treatise wondering if authenticity, as we define it, matters

as much as we might lead ourselves to believe.

論錢鍾書的翻譯觀

為了解決Define eminent的問題，作者張忠安 這樣論述：

錢鍾書先生（1910~1998）或許是中國當代最博學及具批判意識的一位人文學者。他的「化境」翻譯觀，對中國翻譯話語帶來極大的影響，而且也對提升中國傳統翻譯理論帶來實質貢獻，廣受學界認可。然而，對於錢鍾書翻譯論述的確實性，評論家們有諸多批評，認為是個人經驗談、自相矛盾、甚至是幻象，並與中國翻譯傳統產生斷裂。本論文主要即是針對這些挑戰，做出有效的回應，並對錢鍾書的翻譯觀進行全面分析。作者認為我們無法單獨地理解錢鍾書的翻譯思想，而必須檢視該思想所依據的社會、文化、與歷史脈絡，才能理解錢的想法。因此，本論文嘗試將錢鍾書主要的中英文著作中，散落至各處的翻譯評論與批判觀點串連起來，對他的翻譯觀提供邏輯連

貫的論述與分析。首先，探索錢鍾書對佛經翻譯史的論述，並檢視錢鍾書於探討翻譯時運用的闡釋學概念，能全面理解他所支持的忠信翻譯觀的複雜性。第二，本論文也指出錢鍾書的化境翻譯觀，是大多數的中國翻譯理論家們都認識，但只有極少數論者對此觀點仔細地研究。因此，本論文試著對化境觀作出哲學性的詮釋，並探討隱與露的辯證議題。錢鍾書於探討化境這個重要的概念時，即時常提及此重要的文學主題。最後，本論文對晚清當時的社會與文化氛圍做了歷史性的回顧，並試著解釋錢鍾書為何會讚賞林紓於其翻譯作品中作出的種種操作。同時也論證了錢鍾書與林紓兩位知識份子，有雷同的想法，對使用古文與尋找中西方文學的相似性方面，都抱持相似的觀點。錢鍾

書作為翻譯批評家與文學批評家的雙重角色，也會在本論文做出討論。整體而言，本論文澄清了前人對錢鍾書翻譯觀的普遍誤解，並深入分析他的翻譯思維在整體翻譯研究的理論潛能。