New Urban Agenda的問題，透過圖書和論文來找解法和答案更準確安心。 我們找到下列地圖、推薦、景點和餐廳等資訊懶人包

Human Sustainable Cities: Towards the Sdgs and Green, Just, Smart and Inclusive Transitions

為了解決New Urban Agenda的問題，作者 這樣論述：

Chapter1. A Planet of Cities at Times unlike Any Other: Towards the 2030 SustainableDevelopment Agenda.- Chapter2. Urban Ecology and Humanism: Pathways to Regeneration.- Chapter3. Climate-Conscious Cities: The Critical Decade.- Chapter4. The Energy Race to Decarbonisation.- Chapter5. Sustainable

Circular Economies for Transformative Cities.- Chapter6. A New Social Contract for Healthy, Safe and Happy Cities for All.- Chapter7. Cities as Living Labs of Knowledge, Co-creation and Innovation.- Chapter8. Accountable Strategic Planning and Citizen Engagement.- Chapter9. Cities in Concert for the

Global Sustainability Transition.- Annex: Best Practices, Lighthouse Initiatives and Paradigm Shifts.

New Urban Agenda進入發燒排行的影片

鄉村與智慧之結合？建構鄉村智慧旅遊目的地指標之研究

為了解決New Urban Agenda的問題，作者王筑君 這樣論述：

全球科技技術快速攀升，手機行動網路等通訊軟體已與我們日常生活密不可分，而在旅遊方面也改變了以往傳統的型態，資訊貫穿了旅遊活動的主要核心，且對於遊客的互動體驗與旅遊服務品質也更加重視，故智慧旅遊(Smart Tourism)所帶來資訊的方便性與個人化便成為現今的旅遊發展趨勢。除此之外，鄉村旅遊(Rural Tourism)發展面臨各式問題，如遊客對於鄉村旅遊認知缺乏、鄉村旅遊產品單一化、基礎設施設置不完善等各種問題有待解決與改善，然而智慧旅遊的推動是否可以改善鄉村旅遊之困境卻鮮少探討，故本研究以智慧旅遊目的地為聚焦，在供給端透過專家問卷並以模糊德爾菲法(Fuzzy Delphi Method,

FDM)建構鄉村智慧旅遊目的地指標，進而以需求端民眾問卷瞭解認知及滿意程度，並利用重要性-表現分析法(Importance-performance Analysis, IPA)探討目前在鄉村旅遊目的地的改善策略，研究發現智慧旅遊的景點吸引力、輔助性服務及便利設施在鄉村地區需進行改善，並提出具體且有效之建議供相關單位參考。

The Routledge Handbook of Exclusion, Inequality and Stigma in India

為了解決New Urban Agenda的問題，作者 這樣論述：

This handbook critically examines the three concepts of exclusion, inequality and stigma and their interrelationship in the Indian context. Divided into five parts, the volume deals with the issues of exclusion, inequality, gender discrimination, health and disability, and assault and violence. I

t discusses important topical themes such as caste and social exclusion in rural labour markets, impact of poverty and unemployment, discrimination in education and literacy, income inequality and financial inclusion, social security of street vendors, women social entrepreneurs, rural-urban digital

divide, workplace inequality, women trafficking, acid attacks, inter-caste marriages, honour killings, health care and sanitation, discrimination faced by those with disabilities, and regional disparities in India. The book traces rising socio-economic inequality and discrimination along with the s

evere lack of access to resources and opportunities, redressal instruments, legal provisions and implementation challenges, while also looking at deep-rooted causes responsible for their persistence in society. With emphasis on affirmative action, systemic mechanisms, and the role of state and citiz

ens in bridging gaps, the volume presents several policies and strategies for development. It combines wide-ranging empirical case studies backed by relevant theoretical frameworks to map out a new agenda for research on socio-economic inequality in India with important implications for public polic

y.Comprehensive and first of its kind, this handbook will serve as a key reference to scholars, researchers and teachers of exclusion and discrimination studies, social justice, political economy, sociology, anthropology, economics, political science, development studies, education and public admini

stration. It will also be useful to policymakers, bureaucrats, civil society activists, non-governmental organisations and social entrepreneurs in the development sector, in addition to those interested in third world studies, developing economies and the global south.

廣東醫療器械企業協同創新合作夥伴選擇機制與評價體系研究

為了解決New Urban Agenda的問題，作者蘇旋 這樣論述：

協同創新是創新資源和要素的有效匯集、深度融合的一種創新模式，對創新强化產業戰略的實施具有積極作用。在協同創新中合作夥伴選擇具有先導性和基礎性作用，直接影響協同創新的績效和目標的實現。因此，本文對醫療器械企業主導的協同創新合作夥伴選擇的基本特徵、動力來源、影響因素、評價指標、和評價模型等問題開展研究。本文以界定協同創新合作的内涵為起點，對醫療器械企業協同創新合作夥伴選擇的機制進行了分析。在此基礎上提出了廣東醫療器械企業合作夥伴選擇的評價模型。通過質性分析（群組特徵根法）優化評價指標體系，然後通過量化分析（層次分析法）來確定評價體系中各層次指標的重要程度。本研究發現廣東醫療器械企業在選擇協同創新

合作夥伴時商業理念兼容、創新能力、關係互惠是最重要的考慮因素。企業專家們特別關注合作夥伴的戰略目標匹配、掌握的專利數量、行業影響、組織文化兼容、和研發緊密程度等指標。最後，本文進一步討論了結果中專家權重的理論與實踐意義。